Suno Just Proved Its Own Fair Use Defense Was Never True
Nine days after Suno launched v6 in partnership with Warner Music Group, BMG, and Believe, framing it as the moment AI and the music business finally move forward together, Sony Music and Universal Music Group filed a new 45-page lawsuit against the company. Their argument is not just aggressive. It is one of the more precise pieces of legal reasoning to come out of this entire fight, and it deserves credit as exactly that, whatever you think about AI music generally.
Sony's Anthropic Lawsuit Isn't About Protecting Music. It's About Protecting the Gate.
Sony sues Anthropic over pirated lyrics one week after taking equity in an AI music company. Not a contradiction. It's the same playbook. Invest where there's a deal, litigate where there isn't, and make sure you get paid no matter which way the industry moves. AI just lowered the barrier to entry the major labels spent a century building. They're not fighting for artists here. They're fighting to stay the gate.
Stability AI's $76M Funding Round: A Stronger Hand for the Labels, the Same Old Deal for Artists
Sony, Universal, and Warner just all invested in the same AI company. Smart move against Suno in court, since it proves the labels aren't against AI, just against not getting paid for it. But zoom out and it's the same story the industry has told for decades. The label owns the copyright, so the label captures the new revenue stream, even when that revenue comes from a use of the music nobody could have negotiated for when the artist signed. Stronger legal position for the majors. Same old deal for the artists.